The persistent negotiation impasse between the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) and the Women’s National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA) continues to dominate headlines, as reported by our news outlet. Both parties remain entrenched in their positions concerning the collective bargaining agreement (CBA), with the league swiftly responding to the union’s most recent proposal this past Friday.
According to insiders, the latest draft revealed on February 2026 offered no concessions regarding the controversial revenue-sharing framework that has been a focal point of contention throughout the negotiations. The WNBA, maintaining a firm stance, insists on allocating 70% of net revenues to the players, diverging significantly from the union’s demand for a share based on gross revenue figures.
Ongoing Disparities Over Salary Cap and Revenue Allocation
Beyond revenue sharing, the gulf between the two entities extends into salary cap discussions. The players’ association advocates for a cap set at $9.5 million in the inaugural year of the agreement, whereas the league counters with a substantially lower limit, proposing a ceiling of only $5.65 million. This marked difference underscores the broader discord permeating the negotiation process and highlights the challenges in reaching a mutually acceptable framework.
The WNBA’s latest offer, while addressing certain logistical components such as housing, notably refrains from amending its fundamental revenue distribution strategy. The league’s unwillingness to shift from its originally proposed revenue split and salary threshold leaves the union’s demands unmet, thereby prolonging the stalemate.
As the negotiations persist, the contrasting visions for the league’s financial landscape—and the equitable compensation of its athletes—remain unresolved. Our news platform will continue to monitor the developments closely, providing timely updates as the WNBA and WNBPA strive towards consensus.