In an exclusive revelation that has stirred considerable attention in the football world, Xavi Hernández, the legendary former coach of FC Barcelona, has unveiled the true reasons behind the unsuccessful attempt to bring back the iconic Argentine forward, Lionel Messi, to the Catalan club. Contrary to widespread assumptions that financial constraints hindered Messi’s return, Xavi asserts that the primary obstacle was a firm decision imposed by the club’s president, Joan Laporta.
During a candid interview with the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia, published precisely one week prior to Barcelona’s upcoming elections, Xavi expressed his discontent with the narrative presented by Laporta, emphasizing that the president’s version of events diverges from reality. “The president (Laporta) is not telling the truth… Lionel Messi was indeed on the verge of rejoining us,” Xavi stated unequivocally.
Laporta’s Withdrawal and the Collapse of Negotiations
Xavi recounted the timeline of the negotiations, highlighting that talks began in January 2023, shortly after Messi’s triumph as a world champion. “We reached out to him, and he conveyed genuine enthusiasm about returning. I personally met with him, and our discussions extended until March. I informed him that once he gave his consent, I would notify the president, as I considered Messi a perfect fit for the squad from a sporting perspective,” the former Barca coach explained.
Further elaborating on the breakdown of the process, Xavi disclosed that Laporta was initially engaged in contract negotiations with Messi’s father. The club had even secured clearance from the Spanish League Association, yet Laporta abruptly reversed course. “The president literally told me that if Messi returned, it would spark a war against him, and that he could not permit such a scenario. Following this, Messi suddenly ceased answering my calls, informed by others that the deal could not proceed,” Xavi revealed.
Attempting to salvage the situation, Xavi contacted Messi’s father, Jorge, who urged him to communicate directly with Laporta. “I clarified that we had been in talks with Messi for five months and that everything was agreed upon. There was no doubt from the sporting side, and economically, we planned to play at the Montjuïc Stadium. It was akin to performing a ‘last dance,’ reminiscent of Michael Jordan’s final act. Everything was prepared,” Xavi lamented, emphasizing his strong desire to coach Messi once again but acknowledging that internal conflicts thwarted the reunion.
The Dynamics of Xavi and Messi’s Relationship
Addressing his current rapport with Messi, Xavi affirmed that their relationship remains amicable despite the setback. He clarified misconceptions surrounding the failed transfer, asserting that the refusal to facilitate Messi’s comeback did not stem from the league’s regulations or demands for higher wages by Jorge Messi. “The president and his cohort were the ones who said no, asserting their full authority. They feared Messi might wield that power adversely against them,” Xavi commented.
The Spanish football star reflected on the strain this ordeal imposed on his connection with Messi: “It took some time before I spoke to Messi again because he believed I was part of that opposing network. This misunderstanding significantly impacted our relationship. Nonetheless, we have since reconciled. I have always wished for Leo’s return, convinced even today that he would have bolstered the team’s ability to score goals and deliver decisive assists without any doubt. He is poised to participate in the 2026 World Cup!”
He further added, “Leo would have thrived once more at Camp Nou; that was both his wish and mine. He understands this now. However, there was a period during which I could not communicate with him, which was regrettable but attributable to those currently in charge.”
When queried about conversations with Messi regarding Barcelona’s elections, Xavi opted for discretion, stating, “These are private talks. Moreover, given Leo’s substantial influence, I prefer not to disclose anything. Nevertheless, I believe you all have an idea of his stance.”